#81590: "Lords Scoring incorrectly"
De què tracta aquest informe?
Què ha passat? Si us plau, selecciona a sota
Què ha passat? Si us plau, selecciona a sota
Si us plau, comprova si ja existeix un informe sobre el mateix tema
En cas afirmatiu, si us plau VOTA per aquest informe. Els informes amb més vots tenen PRIORITAT!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descripció detallada
-
• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir
Final - part of scoring.
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?
Final - part of scoring.
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?
Final - part of scoring.
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?
Final - part of scoring.
-
• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?
Final - part of scoring.
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?
Final - part of scoring.
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v110
Historial de denúncies
Lords scoring incorrect in two player game. One player had only majority of houses in two quadrants and 2nd in one quadrant - this should total 30 points but received 36 points.
The other player had correctly 36 points with majority in two quadrants and 2nd in two.
Afegeix quelcom a aquest report
- Un altre ID de partida / ID de moviment
- Prémer F5 ha ajudat a arreglar el problema?
- El problema apareix diversos cops? Cada cop? a l'atzar?
- Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
