#42737: "Stale games rule should take into account the number of cards"
De què tracta aquest informe?
Què ha passat? Si us plau, selecciona a sota
Què ha passat? Si us plau, selecciona a sota
Si us plau, comprova si ja existeix un informe sobre el mateix tema
En cas afirmatiu, si us plau VOTA per aquest informe. Els informes amb més vots tenen PRIORITAT!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descripció detallada
-
• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards -
• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
Historial de denúncies
I don't remember exactly the full reasons, but I remember discussing it with Quentin when we designed the feature.
The rule was designed to force the currently winning player to not block the game by repeating the same moves endlessly while the loosing player try to protect their position.
The winning player interest is to give up on the attack to avoid the draw. While the loosing player can be interested in blocking to get a draw instead of a loss.
Afegeix quelcom a aquest report
- Un altre ID de partida / ID de moviment
- Prémer F5 ha ajudat a arreglar el problema?
- El problema apareix diversos cops? Cada cop? a l'atzar?
- Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
