• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Quin és el meu navegador?