• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir

Noted above inline.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

Noted above inline.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?

Noted above inline.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?

Noted above inline.

• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?

Noted above inline.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

Noted above inline.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Quin és el meu navegador?