• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir

End of game standings

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí. És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?

End of game standings

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?

End of game standings

• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?

End of game standings

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí. És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Quin és el meu navegador?