• Si us plau, copia i enganxa el missatge d'error que veus a la pantalla, si és que n'hi ha algun.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Si us plau, què volies fer, què vas fer i que va succeir

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí. És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Què es mostrava a la pantalla quan estaves bloquejat (pantalla en blanc? Part de la interfície del joc? Missatge d'error?)

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina part de les regles no s'han respectat per l'adaptació de BGA

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• És visible la violació de les normes durant la repetició de la partida? Si es així, en quin número de moviment?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Quina va ser l'acció del joc que volies fer?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Què intentes fer per dur a terme aquesta acció del joc?

• Què va passar quan ho vas intentar fer (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat de la partida, ...)?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• A quina fase del joc va passar l'error (quina era la ordre en curs)?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Què va passar quan vas intentar dur a terme l'acció del joc (missatge d'error, missatge de la barra d'estat del joc, ...)?

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, descriviu el problema de visualització. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, copieu/enganxeu el text mostrat en anglès en comptes del teu idioma. Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar un servei d'allotjament d'imatges de la teva elecció (per exemple, snipboard.io) per penjar-la i copiar/enganxar l'enllaç aquí. És aquest text disponible al sistema de traducció? Si és així, ha sigut traduït fa més de 24 hores?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?

• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Quin és el meu navegador?