Tots els informes
Mini Rogue informes
#127481: "above average number of X rolls"
rejected: Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt
1
De què tracta aquest informe?
Què ha passat? Si us plau, selecciona a sota
Suggeriment: al meu entendre, aquesta idea pot millorar molt la implementació del joc
Descripció detallada
• Si us plau, expliqueu el vostre suggeriment de manera precisa i concisa, per que sigui el més fàcil d'entendre possible.
This game seems to pull a higher than average number of x's. In this game there is an example where I rolled 2 x's, and I rerolled them twice and rerolled 2 x's again.• Quin és el meu navegador?
Google Chrome v125
Historial de denúncies
15 de juny 2024 23:32 • Thee Cormorant • Els desenvolupadors encara no han analitzat aquest suggeriment:
this problem appears several games through
16 de juny 2024 1:25 • Kayvon • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
Here's an analysis of half a million random numbers generated by BGA:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=15811&p=59122&hilit=bga_rand#p59122
The dice are weighted exactly as expected. Sorry about your bad luck.
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=15811&p=59122&hilit=bga_rand#p59122
The dice are weighted exactly as expected. Sorry about your bad luck.
22 de juny 2024 4:51 • mightypica • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
Disagree, I roll more X than others in 2p game. I rolled 2 X, at one point and then 3 X and a 1 ( black dice) all in a row. I own the game and playing it live vs this, the average is way off with this game. Not sure if it’s 2 player issue or. It but needs to be resolved.
22 de juny 2024 5:45 • Kayvon • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
There's nothing to resolve, but you're welcome to disagree all the same.
I'd invite you to share your thoughts in the forums where it's a common topic. You'll find several people who agree with you.
I'd invite you to share your thoughts in the forums where it's a common topic. You'll find several people who agree with you.
23 de jul. 2024 18:26 • Kevisch • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
i m sorry, but a ratio like that isn t possible.
23 de jul. 2024 18:29 • Kayvon • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
Not only is it possible, but it's actually likely to happen once in a thousand games or so. Given the thousands played on BGA of just this game, we expect to see exceptional coincidences from time to time. That's the very nature of statistics.
24 de jul. 2024 3:32 • Ditto11 • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
So I was curious . and went over your game log ... I put every roll ... EVERY roll for both players into an excel and calculated their average .. # of 1's rolled (ie x's), and # of 6's rolled ...,
Here's the results:
Average of all rolls by each player:
Thee Cormorant: 3.519
Slaad nero: 3.219
# of rolls made total:
Thee Cormorant: 135
Slaad nero: 155
# of 1's (and x's) rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 25 (~ 18.52% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 33 (~ 21.29% of all rolls)
# of 6's rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 26 (~19.26% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 25 (~16.13% of all rolls).
Conclusion:
1) Averages are pretty spot on . in fact, looks like the other player rolled worse than you did.
2) you rolled about the same # of 1's and 6's ...
3) I noticed your "double x" turn .. and yes it sucks ... however, the turn before, AND the turn after, you rolled 3x 6's or 2x 6s and a 5 .. or such ... so those kinds of things happen both ways, and balance each other out.
4) game seems to be working perfectly fine within standard deviation probability statistics ... you had ONE unlucky round ... but failed to mention the really GOOD rounds you had ...
I would advise next time if you think you are being "cheated" .. to gather the evidence yourself and see what that statistics actually say ..., ;)
Good luck and have fun!
Here's the results:
Average of all rolls by each player:
Thee Cormorant: 3.519
Slaad nero: 3.219
# of rolls made total:
Thee Cormorant: 135
Slaad nero: 155
# of 1's (and x's) rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 25 (~ 18.52% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 33 (~ 21.29% of all rolls)
# of 6's rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 26 (~19.26% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 25 (~16.13% of all rolls).
Conclusion:
1) Averages are pretty spot on . in fact, looks like the other player rolled worse than you did.
2) you rolled about the same # of 1's and 6's ...
3) I noticed your "double x" turn .. and yes it sucks ... however, the turn before, AND the turn after, you rolled 3x 6's or 2x 6s and a 5 .. or such ... so those kinds of things happen both ways, and balance each other out.
4) game seems to be working perfectly fine within standard deviation probability statistics ... you had ONE unlucky round ... but failed to mention the really GOOD rounds you had ...
I would advise next time if you think you are being "cheated" .. to gather the evidence yourself and see what that statistics actually say ..., ;)
Good luck and have fun!
24 de jul. 2024 4:59 • Kayvon • Els desenvolupadors pensen que no és una bona idea o que el seu rati de cost/benefici és massa alt:
Excellent analysis, Ditto! I wish there were a way to sticky your comment for all similar threads that appear with some regularity. Truly top-notch work.
Afegeix quelcom a aquest report
Si us plau afegiu aquí qualsevol cosa que sembli rellevant per tal de reproduir aquest error o entendre el vostre suggeriment:
- Un altre ID de partida / ID de moviment
- Prémer F5 ha ajudat a arreglar el problema?
- El problema apareix diversos cops? Cada cop? a l'atzar?
- Si tens una captura de pantalla d'aquest error (bona pràctica), pots utilitzar Imgur.com per pujar-ho i copiar i enganxar el link aquí.
